Comments on: Denis Smith’s Ball of Light

By: dael

dael — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:51:58 +0000

agree with jolie and kyrie. the simicity of the sphere and the actual scene makes it all the more cpativating. The scene doesn’t get lost in a world of lighting colour

By: Kyrie

Kyrie — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:52:52 +0000

I agree with Jolie. There are heaps of light painters out there but what makes Smith’s work so unique is the settings – take the ball of light out of the frame and you still have an intriguing photo. I haven’t seen other light painters create such perfect spheres in a range of bright and low light conditions. I like the fact that this isn’t overdone with a million different light painting techniques!

By: Jolie McCrea

Jolie McCrea — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:47:20 +0000

I’d argue that the “basic sphere” is what makes Smith’s work so captivating. It’s ethereal and still organic. It doesn’t feel over-processed to me. It fits into, and augments, its settings with out overwhelming. I think it’s beautiful.

By: James Charlick

James Charlick — Sun, 16 May 2010 17:46:39 +0000

If you like Light Graffiti, check out Michael Bosanko: http://www.michaelbosanko.com/portfolio50325.html

Lots of good work, and much more interesting than basic spheres.

By: Gloria Lenon

Gloria Lenon — Sun, 16 May 2010 02:57:31 +0000

I want one in my bedroom.